I am here to tell you that so far so good. Here are the new pictures of the same bead. Again, there isn't much difference, except the ProtectaClear side is just a little shinier.
The original urethane coating |
The ProtectaClear side two days out |
I will tell you this, I was naughty and tested the surface with a fingernail, and yes, I was able to put a slight dent in the ProtectaClear finish. That was, however, before Everbrite told me I probably shouldn't. Guess I'm bad...
While this experiment continues on this one little bead, I am going to be purchasing some water-based urethane to try on another copper wire piece, a beadless piece. I have read other blogs whose experiments with this materials yields varying results. Some say that over time, a water-based urethane will still let a small amount of oxygen through to the metal, especially copper, and that could cause an aging process to begin, even though it might be a minute amount or take some time to happen to the degree that might be unacceptable. We shall see.
Next time I will provide you with more details on my little bead experiment, and I will start a discussion on using Renaissance Was on your wire projects. Until then...
Stay Wire Up! Gail
Thanks for sharing your research. I will also be interested in the tests on wire, esp. with the Renaissance Wax.
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this has been quite interesting. I tried a product from the Everbrite company and found that the copper still changed color. I don't think it was the same one you used though.
ReplyDelete